Skip to main content

Posts

Excerpts (with some annotations) from "Competition Is For Losers" by Peter Thiel

Source :  http://online.wsj.com/articles/peter-thiel-competition-is-for-losers-1410535536 The above article by Peter Thiel is the best business + economics education I have ever received or can ever conceive of receiving. Something about "anti-trust" always rubbed me the wrong way -- now I know what!! In the following, I organize excerpts from his article into named sections and summarize, emphasize and/or annotate (minimally) along the way. ________________________ CAPTURING VS. CREATING VALUE Creating value isn't enough—you also need to capture some of the value you create . Airlines create value but run razor-thin margins and are unable to capture the value they create vs. Google creates far less value but is able to capture most of it. MONOPOLY VS. PERFECT COMPETITION Competition is idealized and monopoly is abhorred -- in academia and among the general public.  "Americans mythologize competition and credit it with saving us from...

indices of liberty

++ Indices Of Liberty ++ A view of economic, journalistic, political and civil freedoms and tax competitiveness around the world , from various sources. (The top 53 countries (ordered by rank) from the first three indices and notable countries from the last index are shown.) Sources [EFW2013] Economic Freedom of the World, Fraser Institute & CATO Institute,  http:// www.freetheworld.com/2013/ EFW2013-complete.pdf [IEF2014] Index of Economic Freedom, 2014, Heritage & WSJ,  http://www.heritage.org/ index/ [WPF2014] World Press Freedom Index, 2014, Reporters Without Borders,  http://rsf.org/index2014/ en-index2014.php [FH2014] Freedom in the World, 2014, Freedom House,  http:// www.freedomhouse.org/ report/freedom-world/ freedom-world-2014#.U3v4mvl dWpA [TF2014] International Tax Competitiveness Index, 2014, Tax Foundation,  http://taxfoundation.org/sites/taxfoundation.org/files/docs/TaxFoundation_ITCI_2014_0.pdf #liberty   #tlot

the statist cycle

We often talk of the business enterprise and the business cycle. Interestingly, the dominant political system in most developed economies may also be regarded as a cyclic enterprise. It can properly be called the statist cycle . The statist nature of these governments is the only constant, regardless of whether the particular one in question is progressive (i.e. left-wing) or conservative (i.e. right-wing), differing only in their particular emphases. It is the biased and prejudiced opinion of this author that left-wing governments are more statist than right-wing ones (although, this may be an insignificant difference in degree and not of kind, and, hence, caveat lector ). Without further ado,..... The statist cycle :  1. identify a socio-economic "problem" (real or imaginary) 2. spend money to create a new bureaucracy agency or program to fix said problem 3. (optionally, raise taxes to fund said program, or, preferably, go into debt) 4. consolidat...

Private philanthropy is beautiful!

Financial flow is defined as the sum of : (a) private flows : the flow of private capital + private philanthropy + private remittances, and (b) state flows : i.e. ODA (governmental/official development assistance) In 2011, total financial flow from developed economies to developing economies was $577 B Of this, 80% ($461 B) was private flow Of this, total private philanthropy was 13% ($59 B) The total flow from the US alone was $278.5 B  Of this, about 90% ($251 B) was private flow Of this, total private philanthropy was 15.5% ($39 B) Reference: [ Index of Global Philanthropy and Remittances, 2013 ]

A note on think tanks

In this article, the following think tanks are considered: Libertarian https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundation_for_Economic_Education https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reason_Foundation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cato_Institute https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludwig_von_Mises_Institute https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayn_Rand_Institute https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campaign_for_Liberty Conservative https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Heritage_Foundation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Enterprise_Institute Progressive https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_for_the_American_Way https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_on_Budget_and_Policy_Priorities https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_Policy_Institute https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Society_Foundations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_for_Economic_and_Policy_Research https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campaign_for_America's_Future https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_for_American_Progress...

On libertarian law & legal systems (a series by Duncan Whitmore)

This post contains some scribbled notes and quotes from my reading of Duncan Whitmore's excellent series of articles on libertarian law & legal systems. Part 1 -- Foundations the question of liability legal positivism vs. natural law law is violently enforceable rule to protect one's life and property against aggression Part 2 -- self-ownership & original appropriation who are legal persons with rights & obligations? answer: demonstrated rational action implies self-ownership and, therefore, implies legal personhood "" What each person appears to be able to enjoy in contemporary legal systems is not self-ownership and the right to private property; instead, it is a concoction of artificial and invented rights and obligations that are bracketed under the term human rights. Human rights, however, are never termed in such a way as to confer their full, irrevocable benefit upon each individual human; rather they are a buffet-sel...