Skip to main content

privacy on the cloud

There is a huge variety of cloud-based data archival and backup services available today. The following were shortlisted based on certain desirable features such as encrypted storage, personal encryption (zero knowledge), storage size and bandwidth limits and cross-platform support. 


The pricing structure and other particular features are outlined below. The order reflects the slight preferences of the author.
  1. MEGA
    • # machines : ?
    • Pricing
      • 50GB – Free
      • 4TB - $12/m
  2. Crashplan
    • # machines : up to 10 computers
    • Pricing
      • Unlimited - $13.99/m, $150/y
    • Other features
      • de-dup
      • can run server-free, exchanging backup space with friends and family
  3. AltDrive
    • # machines : 3 computers
    • Pricing
      • Unlimited - $9.95/m, $99/y
    • Other features
      • de-dup
  4. Bitcasa
    • # machines :  up to  5 devices
    • Pricing
      • 20GB - Free (up to 3 devices)
      • 1TB - $10/m, $99/y (up to 5 devices)
      • 5TB - $49/m, $499/y (up to 5 devices)
      • Unlimited - $99/m, $999/y (up to 5 devices)
  5. Elephant Drive
    • # machines : up to 10 devices
    • Pricing
      • 100GB - $9.95/m, $100/y
      • 250GB - $19.95/m, $201/y
      • 1TB     - $85.95/m, $86/y
      • 2TB - $169.95/m, $1713/y
  6. Wuala
    • Pricing
      • 5GB – Free
      • 50 GB - $6.99/m, $75/y
      • 100GB - $11.99/m, $129/y
      • 200GB - $22.99/m, $249/y
      • 500GB - $54.99/m, $599/y
      • 1TB - $99.99/m, $1099/y
      • 2TB - $179.95/m, $1999/y
  7. Spider Oak
    • # machines : unlimited
    • Pricing
      • 2GB – Free
      • 100GB - $10/m, $100/y
      • 200GB - $20/m
      • 500GB - $50/m
      • 1TB - $100/m
    • Other features
      • de-dup


Diversification
A prudent cloud-backup strategy would involve using multiple services – diversified geographically, both in terms of the location of the company and the location of the data. So, for e.g., a combination of MEGA, Crashplan and AltDrive, would satisfy both criteria.

Local Encryption
Locally securing the data in an encrypted vault, using tools such as BoxCryptor,  TrueCrypt or FreeOTFE (see here for a comparison), before sending along the wire, adds an additional layer of security and privacy. "There is a potential backup trap when it is used for files that will be synced or stored in the cloud. Encryption programs that create encrypted “volumes” (files that contain encrypted files) do not change the size of the volume (container file), and often – intentionally – do not change the modified date of the volume, even though files in the volume have been changed or added. The result can be that your cloud service does not recognize that the volume file has changed, and will fail to update the online copy. TrueCrypt is an example of an encryption program that does not change the modified date of volume files (encrypted file container). However, some cloud backup services – Dropbox for example – check the hash value of volume files, not the date, and if that changes Dropbox stores the latest copy of the volume file. If you’re using Dropbox, that makes TrueCrypt an excellent way to implement client-side encryption for your most sensitive files. SkyDrive, monitors the modified date – not a hash value – so TrueCrypt volumes are not updated in the cloud by SkyDrive after their content changes client-side."(quoted verbatim from [2])

The Bottom Line
  1. At the very least, use an online back service that provides the feature of personal encryption (in addition to encrypted storage). This means that nobody in the company can easily break into and peer at your data. This also means, however, that the data can be irretrievable if one forget their personal key/password etc. All of the services listed above provide personal encryption (except, on a technicality, Bitcasa -- but their approach is quite similar).
  2. Optionally, diversify your data and use multiple services.
  3. Optionally, vault your data locally and then backup the vault.
    1. This option can also be used in conjunction with a service that does not provide personal on-the-fly encryption

Sources 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

the World Cup draw -- an alternative proposal

The FIFA World Cup seeding and draw system has consistently produced groups of death and groups comprised mainly of teams that fail to invoke passion or imagination from fans around the world, except perhaps for such teams' own fans. The latest edition is no exception -- and may even be the worst ever on this measure. An outline of the draw system can be seen here . We have one group which contains Switzerland, Ecuador and Honduras and another consisting of Russia, Algeria and South Korea!! And, on top of this, we have at least three, if not four or more, groups of death. Depending on one's perspective, esp. given the recent rise of African powerhouses, all of the rest of the groups may even be considered Groups of Death!! This is a disservice to football fans around the world, not to mention the skilled and enterprising teams that worked hard to get here. To address this, I propose a simplified draw system : Randomize Pot 1 and assign to Groups Assign remaining Pots t...

Migrating from MS SQL Server to MongoDB

The following contains notes from various attempts at migrating 2.5GB of MS SQL Server data to MongoDB, on an 8 GB, quad-core, 64-bit Windows 7 Enterprise machine. [TERMINATED]  http://mssql2mongo.codeplex.com/ : Simple to use. Exponential slowdown observed in migration. For a total of the 50 million records spanning two tables, the following migration times were observed: 1 second for the first 100,000 records,  30 minutes for 1,000,000, 20 hours for 16 million (after which I terminated the process). [DID NOT WORK] http://rubydoc.info/gems/mongify/ : A ruby-based approach. Use Ruby 1.9.3 (tiny_tds dependency causes problems with Ruby 2.0). Install DevKit before installing the mongify gem. Also, use ' sqlserver ' as the adapter in the .config file. Then, before running ' mongify check <config-file> ', install the gems  activerecord-sqlserver-adapter  and tiny_tds . At this stage, it fails. ' mongify translation <config-file> ' fails as well. ...

the resurgence of liberty

Political awareness and activism at the grassroots level is rising in the United States. The political spectrum in the United States is changing. Long seen as one-dimensional (left vs. right), there has been a strengthening and orthogonalization of at least one more axis -- that of liberty, and the lack thereof. Libertarianism is most certainly on the rise -- with a rising concern, across all demographics, for broader economic ( laissez-faire capitalism  and Austrian economics ) and personal freedoms ( civil libertarianism ). While a majority of the new libertarians come from the right , there is also growing number of left-libertarians as well as a significant exodus of liberals and progressives toward classical libertarianism. Fiscal conservatism is a defining characteristic of the traditional right-wing. This ideology is generally hawkish on spending, budget deficits and taxes and moderate on business regulation and social safety-net programs, advocating for fiscal and mo...