Skip to main content

some contrarian views, maybe?

a.k.a the manifesto of the evil regressive who attempted to make progress.

Here goes.

I support labor unions, business regulation and labor rights. 

I support a bigger minimum wage.

I support environmental and natural resource stewardship and, in general, stewardship of the commons (regardless of whether man-made climate change is real or not). Therefore, I support carbon and pollution taxes. I support sustainable development.

I support Obama (gasp!) and Kerry on foreign policy, and, oppose McCain, Graham and other hawks, on the former's' approach of using diplomacy and economic sanctions in dealing with Russia and Iran.

I support free public healthcare and education for the poorest of the poor.


Breathe. Let that sink in.

Do all of the above make me a commie, a peacenik or a green? No, it doesn't. For the record, I still remain, at heart, a true libertarian conservative and a Tea Partier, through and through.

All of the so-called progressive causes listed above are defensible from a libertarian and market-centric perspective.

The invisible hand of the market does not require a prop. I believe that public policy ideas and legislative deliberations are part of the market. In other words, the marketplace of goods and the marketplace of ideas form a complete whole. And, the market will sustain and bear exactly what it can -- i.e. all of the above causes can be legislated up to and exactly up to the point where it stops making economic sense.

And, it is exactly for this reason that I love the legislature -- and, esp. when it is grinds slowly, as it does in these times of "partisan gridlock". I support the legislature's right to enact laws supporting the above casues, or any other cause, for that matter. For the same reason, I oppose executive overreach and judicial activism, in failing to enforce existing laws or going beyond their Constitutional scope to wantonly overturn laws or to adjudicate where no relevant law exists.

Most of all, I strongly advocate drastically lessening the size and scope of government by starving the beast. I support increasing the efficiency of governmental agencies and reducing waste and redundancy and increasing transparency and public oversight. I do not believe that the 5th amendment applies to public (i.e. government) employees.

I suppose both the reduction of taxes across the board and the elimination of market-distorting special subsidies and corporate tax breaks -- the government must not pick winners and losers, period. I support the simplification of the tax code.

I oppose government intervention in the private health care and health insurance markets.

I support educational and school choice. I believe in parents' rights.

I support the demilitarization of domestic police, national guard and law enforcement -- domestic militarization and citizen disarmament is the first step towards the creation of a police state.

I believe that the government should not engage in warrantless domestic surveillance. I believe in dismantling the current surveillance state infrastructure.

I believe in ending the War on Drugs -- because it did not, and will not, work.

I believe in the reduction of the size of the military. I believe in the strengthening of trade, cultural, diplomatic and private philanthropic and humanitarian ties. I believe in the reduction of taxpayer-funded foreign aid across the board, and on making it contingent on American strategic interests. I believe in strengthening covert operations against strategic enemies. I oppose indefinite detention (and, extraordinary rendition) of American citizens, in all cases.

I support the 2nd amendment. I believe in the right and, indeed, in the responsibility of all citizens to be well-trained in using weapons. I believe in the necessity of having many well-armed, well-trained, voluntary militias.

I support the 4th amendment.

I support the 1st amendment. I support the gradual repeal of anti-discrimination, libel and Affirmative Action laws -- because I believe that, even here, as in most cases, the market is sufficient.

I support the 10th amendment.

In fact, I support the Constitution in its entirety.

Popular posts from this blog

Migrating from MS SQL Server to MongoDB

The following contains notes from various attempts at migrating 2.5GB of MS SQL Server data to MongoDB, on an 8 GB, quad-core, 64-bit Windows 7 Enterprise machine.
[TERMINATED] : Simple to use. Exponential slowdown observed in migration. For a total of the 50 million records spanning two tables, the following migration times were observed: 1 second for the first 100,000 records,  30 minutes for 1,000,000, 20 hours for 16 million (after which I terminated the process).[DID NOT WORK] : A ruby-based approach. Use Ruby 1.9.3 (tiny_tds dependency causes problems with Ruby 2.0). Install DevKit before installing the mongify gem. Also, use 'sqlserver' as the adapter in the .config file. Then, before running 'mongify check <config-file>', install the gems activerecord-sqlserver-adapter and tiny_tds. At this stage, it fails. 'mongify translation <config-file>' fails as well.[MODIFIED/WORKED!!]…

The moral filth of neo-liberal and neo-conservative statism

or, progressive socialism is not the greater evil.
After years of trying to make sense of how the world works, economically and politically, and how, according to some, it ought to work, I have increasingly come to the realization that the libertarian political-philosophical persuasion is the only one consistent with justice. A just society must necessarily be a free society. Specifically, one that is founded on libertarian principles -- private property, NAP, non-initiation of violence, easement & homesteading rights, etc. In fact, the “justness” (righteousness) of a society will increase in concert with and to the degree to which a society moves from totalitarian statism to democratic statism (of the neo-conservative or neo-liberal varieties) to minarchism to anarchism.
After spending a few zealous but misguided and ignorantly happy years occupied with mainstream GOP politics, including loyally and foolishly supporting the Bush-Cheney-Rove regime, despite serious mo…

Diversity in politics

There are so many strains of thought and ideology in secular democracies around the world, exemplified, perhaps best, in contemporary American political life. Some of these strains of thought are compatible with others and may even be subsets of others. Many of them are violently opposed to others. In the American context, we see, at least, the following :  environmentalismcultural progressivismeconomic socialismprogressive-lite Keynesian welfare + neocon warfare hawks = the establishment / moderates / centristscivil libertarianismnon-interventionismsocial conservatismConstitutional conservatismfree-market libertarianismpopulism, protectionism & nativism, anti-progressivism, anti-establishment
A neat left-right divide no longer makes sense. Most people find themselves on a spectrum between very different political philosophies and emphases.
The two major political parties represent uneasy marriages that exist because for historical reasons or current tactical alliances. The fragil…