Skip to main content

My politico-philosophical and ideological progression (from 2004 - present)




Notes
1. circa 2012 : some sections of the Tea Party gradually shifted focus to and became more vocal about populist nationalism -- i.e., militaristic posturing & economic protectionism. I do not associate myself with these ideas. However, I continue to retain immense gratitude for the original movement and its current champions, Ted Cruz, Justin Amash etc., as profoundly influential in my political maturation.

2. While I am a libertarian, my Patriot and social-conservative ideological roots are influential in the following manner:

(A) I am still Patriotic to the American idea (Jefferson, Madison, anti-Hamilton) and the Constitution -- not to the corrupt crony-capitalist, welfare-warfare-statist federal government that has co-opted the media and academia, and

(B) I am socially conservative personally, but not politically, esp. in the areas of drug policy, censorship, non-violent "offenses", consensual adult relationships, etc. In all these areas, I propose complete liberty -- live and let live. I may personally disagree with and find abhorrent someone else's beliefs and views in these areas of personal lifestyle choice -- but, I will defend to the death their natural rights to them. Legislated morality is tyranny.

The definition of marriage in government may or may not be done at any level (local, State or Federal); but, if done, must be completely disconnected from any economic incentive -- i.e. tax breaks and civil benefits (such as guardianship, visitation and powers of attorney). All tax breaks for marriage must be removed. Or, conversely, all tax breaks given to married couples must also be extended to all cohabiting (married or not, incl. non-sexual) relationships, such as, for e.g. roommates. Civil benefits, similarly, must be extended to all cohabiting (married or not, incl. non-sexual) relationships, such as, for e.g. roommates.

Furthermore, preferably, marriage should not be defined at all -- at any level of civic government. However, if it is defined, it must be done by the people (legislature(s)) and not by executive or judicial fiat. States and localities are free to overturn the definitions promulgated from above or elsewhere, within their jurisdictions.

Even then, one would have to carefully construct a rational, well-reasoned and reasonable legal defense for possibly excluding some consensual adult relationships (e.g. polyandry, polygamy) and including others (e.g. monogamy), from the perspective of the Equal Protection Clause, in the 14th Amendment, esp. given that some arrangements of the former variety are more prevalent historically than some arrangements of the latter variety.

Lastly, abortion is murder. It has nothing to do with being socially conservative. Any government that allows abortion de jure is legally sanctioning murder of a specific kind -- targeting the most vulnerable population in society.

Popular posts from this blog

Migrating from MS SQL Server to MongoDB

The following contains notes from various attempts at migrating 2.5GB of MS SQL Server data to MongoDB, on an 8 GB, quad-core, 64-bit Windows 7 Enterprise machine.
[TERMINATED] http://mssql2mongo.codeplex.com/ : Simple to use. Exponential slowdown observed in migration. For a total of the 50 million records spanning two tables, the following migration times were observed: 1 second for the first 100,000 records,  30 minutes for 1,000,000, 20 hours for 16 million (after which I terminated the process).[DID NOT WORK] http://rubydoc.info/gems/mongify/ : A ruby-based approach. Use Ruby 1.9.3 (tiny_tds dependency causes problems with Ruby 2.0). Install DevKit before installing the mongify gem. Also, use 'sqlserver' as the adapter in the .config file. Then, before running 'mongify check <config-file>', install the gems activerecord-sqlserver-adapter and tiny_tds. At this stage, it fails. 'mongify translation <config-file>' fails as well.[MODIFIED/WORKED!!]…

Diversity in politics

There are so many strains of thought and ideology in secular democracies around the world, exemplified, perhaps best, in contemporary American political life. Some of these strains of thought are compatible with others and may even be subsets of others. Many of them are violently opposed to others. In the American context, we see, at least, the following :  environmentalismcultural progressivismeconomic socialismprogressive-lite Keynesian welfare + neocon warfare hawks = the establishment / moderates / centristscivil libertarianismnon-interventionismsocial conservatismConstitutional conservatismfree-market libertarianismpopulism, protectionism & nativism, anti-progressivism, anti-establishment
A neat left-right divide no longer makes sense. Most people find themselves on a spectrum between very different political philosophies and emphases.
The two major political parties represent uneasy marriages that exist because for historical reasons or current tactical alliances. The fragil…

The moral filth of neo-liberal and neo-conservative statism

or, progressive socialism is not the greater evil.
Introduction
After years of trying to make sense of how the world works, economically and politically, and how, according to some, it ought to work, I have increasingly come to the realization that the libertarian political-philosophical persuasion is the only one consistent with justice. A just society must necessarily be a free society. Specifically, one that is founded on libertarian principles -- private property, NAP, non-initiation of violence, easement & homesteading rights, etc. In fact, the “justness” (righteousness) of a society will increase in concert with and to the degree to which a society moves from totalitarian statism to democratic statism (of the neo-conservative or neo-liberal varieties) to minarchism to anarchism.
After spending a few zealous but misguided and ignorantly happy years occupied with mainstream GOP politics, including loyally and foolishly supporting the Bush-Cheney-Rove regime, despite serious mo…